[ad_1]
LONDON (AP) — It’s not just you. Many people think Google search is getting worse.besides The rise of generative AI chatbots Provides people with new and different ways to find information.
While Google has been a one-stop shop for decades—after all, we usually refer to searches as “Google searches”—its long-term dominance has attracted a lot of sponsored or spammy links driven by “SEO” techniques and Spam. This reduces truly useful results.
A Recent research by German researchers This shows that the quality of search results on Google, Bing, and DuckDuckGo is indeed declining. Citing third-party measurements, Google said the quality of its results was significantly better than those of its competitors.
Now, chatbots are powered by generative artificial intelligence, including Google itself, are poised to change the way search works.But they also have their own problems: because the technology is so new, Concerns about the accuracy and reliability of artificial intelligence chatbots.
If you want to try the AI method, please refer to the following instructions:
Where can I find artificial intelligence search tools?
Google users don’t have to look too far. The company launched its own artificial intelligence chatbot assistant last year, called a bardbut recently the name retirement and replace it with a similar service Gemini.
Bard users are now redirected to Gemini websitewhich can be accessed directly from a desktop or mobile browser.
The Gemini app is also launching in the U.S. this month, and in Japanese, Korean, and English globally (except for the U.K., Switzerland, and Europe), according to the update notification, which hints that more countries and languages are “coming soon.”
Google has also been testing a new search product called a “search-generated experience” that replaces links with AI-generated snapshots of key information.But only for US users who signed up through its experiment Laboratory site.
Microsoft’s Bing search engine provides generative artificial intelligence search supported by the following technologies OpenAI’s ChatGPT technology About a year ago, first in name Bing Chathas now been renamed Co-Pilot.
On the Bing search homepage, click the Chat or Co-Pilot button below the search window and you’ll see a conversational interface where you can enter your question. There’s also a co-pilot app.
A A large number of new artificial intelligence search websites have appeared, but they are not that easy to find. A standard Google search isn’t much help, but a search on Copilot and Bard turns up a number of names, including Perplexity, HuggingChat, You.com, Komo, Andi, Phind, Exa, and AskAI.
Do I have to register or pay?
Most of these services have free versions. They typically limit the number of queries you can make, but offer premium tiers that offer smarter artificial intelligence and more features.
For example, Gemini users can pay $20 for a premium version that gives access to its “most powerful” model, Ultra 1.0.
Gemini users need to be logged in with a Google account and be at least 13 years old (18 years old in Europe or Canada). Copilot users can access the service through Bing search or the Copilot homepage without logging in to a Microsoft account.
New websites are basically free to use and do not require setting up an account. Many also have advanced levels.
How to conduct artificial intelligence search?
AI queries should be conversational, rather than typing in a string of keywords, such as, “Is Taylor Swift the most successful female musician?” or “Where are the best places to travel in Europe this summer?”
Perplexity recommends using “everyday natural language”. Fender says it’s best to ask “comprehensive and detailed questions,” starting with the “what” or “how.”
If you’re not satisfied with the answer, some sites let you ask follow-up questions and zero in on the information you need. Some ask suggestions or related questions.
Microsoft’s Copilot lets you choose from three different chat styles: creative, balanced, or precise.
How is the result?
Unlike Google search results, which display a range of links, including sponsored links, Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Give a readable summary of the information, sometimes with key links as footnotes. Depending on the site, the answer will vary—sometimes significantly.
They can shine when you’re searching for obscure facts, like detailed information about something. EU policy.
Phind.com’s answers are the most readable and are always provided in narrative form. But the site mysteriously went offline at some point.
Test a simple query – What is the average temperature in London in late February? — produced a similar range of results on most sites: 7-9 degrees Celsius (45-48 degrees Fahrenheit).
Oddly, Andy provided the current weather conditions in New York, although it used the correct city on another later attempt.
Another search – for the name and tenure of the chief executive of British luxury carmaker Aston Martin – is information that can be found online but requires some work to piece together.
Most sites provide names from the past year or two. AskAI provides a list dating back to 1947, along with its first three “authoritative sources”, but without links.
What are the disadvantages?
While chatbots sound authoritative because they produce answers that look like they were written by a confident person, they are not always correct. Artificial intelligence chatbots are known for providing deceptive and convincing responses, known as “illusions.” HuggingChat warns that “generated content may be inaccurate or false” and Gemini says it may “display inaccurate information, including information about people.”
These AI systems scan large amounts of information collected from the web (called large language models) and then use algorithms to come up with coherent answers, but not all reveal how they arrive at their answers.
Some artificial intelligence chatbots make public the models trained by their algorithms. Others provide few or no details. The best advice is to try multiple methods and compare the results, and always double-check the source.
For example, Cuomo at one point insisted that Canada’s population was about 1 million in 1991, a wrong number he insisted on even after I followed up to ask if he was sure. It cites a Wikipedia page that shows the figure comes from a table of the country’s indigenous population. When I tried again later, it found the correct number.
___
Do you have a technical challenge you need help solving? Write to us: onetechtip@ap.org Bring your questions.
[ad_2]
Source link